EP3: State Sponsored Malpractice - Monologue
Imagine if a hospital decided that instead of treating gunshot wounds with the typical methods it would instead have its staff use magic spells to heal them? Sounds kinda crazy I know, but think about it for a second, what would have to happen for this to occur?
The way it seems to work nowadays is that a bureaucrat would decide from a centralized place of power, that in a top down decree that he or she wants the staff of the hospital to adopt a practice over the traditional western one. Those who share those similar ideological viewpoints or those who don't want to ruffle feathers go along with it. The opposition is ignored. The policy is enforced by managers and security. Any who oppose are ousted. Next thing you know patients are bleeding out while people in scrubs are chanting.
It sounds ridiculous because it is. Having a central figure or central planning decide what's best for you based on scientifically unfounded opinions is ludicrous. Especially when it it is applied to science and medical care. If your local hospital administrator thought it was necessary to slaughter a goat to prevent high blood pressure you may want to look for a second opinion. But what if you weren't allowed to find one? What if the other opinions about how to heal gunshot wounds and high blood pressure were outlawed and you were mandated to follow these insane practices? How close are we to that now?
Well instead of going full pagan ritual our supposed representatives around the world are taking assumptions made from cherry picked information, studies that are inconclusive, and mere statements from political appointees which they selected to enforce their new rules. These rules also happen to align with the political philosophy of these representatives. Without any objective scrutiny or judgment these mandates and orders have overtaken the medical world. Medical practice is now governed by political ideology. Nothing needs to be demonstrated first or replicated in order to be considered fact. In fact, haha, facts can now be deemed misinformation if they go against the predominant political orthodoxy in your area. Which means that your inherent right to free speech, due process, and informed consent is now being ignored in favor of whatever action the state or governing body or company wants to take under the guise of protecting you and others. If this becomes the norm, which it appears that it has, then the established means we have in western culture to determine the course of our healthcare becomes a political decision. Not an ethical or scientific one.
What history has shown us is that when this occurs, scientific progress ceases. If no scientists choose to challenge the orthodoxy then things stay the same or get worse. In communist countries they tried this with farming and people starved. In Germany they tried it with medicine and the results were so horrific the western world came up with the Nuremberg Code to make sure it never happened again. In America we experimented on our own people for what some thought was the greater good and the harm from that still resonates within our black population. What does history tell of us if we let this occur again?
This week I watched a candidate for Lt Governor in Clark County Nevada be assaulted for standing up for the right of free speech. I believe the reason behind the attack on his body was because you have no right to refuse the new orthodoxy. You can't speak out or find representation or collective action. That decision has been made for you by people who believe they are justified in doing so based on their beliefs or associations. The facts would just get in their way or at worst for them, strip them of some of their power. And many of them believe they have been granted that power as a sign of their righteousness, their expertise, or their will.
What evidence did the commission in clark county ever present and what counter evidence did they consider in regards to its policy regarding covid misinformation? Is it just one sided? How can an assumption be a fact? How can they mandate something like that after it's been revealed that most of what we have been told about the mitigation efforts around the world have shown to be not true or inconclusive?
It happens because people like those on that commission accept only parts that fit their narrative and disregard the rest. They are institutionalizing a bias that they clearly present to the public, as in the case of the "get the vax" commissioner. No other due process is given to determine the truth, only one side is accepted. This is medical lysenkoism. These are tyrants disregarding law and human rights to assert their will onto the public. They can bang a gabble and proclaim themselves the arbiters of truth. They can vote unanimously that they know the whole story and can decide the fate of their constituents.
They know the shot works. They know you'll be ok if you get it. That it's safe and effective. That it's ok for children to have it. Just like it's ok that they wear masks all day. Even if they are opposed by the majority of the public they have the media on their side along with corporations and higher forms of government. They have almost all branches of government backing them up. When it comes down to it though it's about enforcement and compliance. Rather as local as your school board or county or as large as the Federal government these arbitrary rules have to be enforced and rights have to be violated to enact them. No matter how trivial or how serious it's up to the people enforcing the laws to decide how far they will go and a lot of that depends on how much resistance they get from the communities they are a part of. That resistance needs to be non violent, non compliant, and steadfast. It also needs to be backed up with the insistence that our side be heard. Therefore I propose a new phrase I want you all to consider when dealing with these issues: Demand Answers Not Orders.
When you ask your local political figure a question and they can't or refuse to answer but instead move to further their covid agenda of masking, lockdowns, or mandatory vaccination you must refuse to follow the order until your questions have been answered. Until our questions have been answered the consent of the people has not been reached. This makes any order or law null and void. We will not comply with a government that will not hear and respect and answer our questions.
The Biden administration has taken this nontransparent approach along with all of the other political actors from the various agencies governing these policies. No one is being held to account in the public square and the public square is being sanitized of dissent. If you have to recognize an untruth as true just to defeat that untruth in a council meeting or any other place then it is obvious that you are dissenting against an authority with a disregard for truth. This new orthodoxy in science has been asserted by government not through the scientific method. It never has to demonstrate the results of its claims. It just states a claim as if it were true. Then, in a lot of cases when it becomes apparent that the claim isn't true they go on to moving the goal post or gaslighting. They change the focus to a new rule or crisis or just say the science has changed not acknowledging the counter evidence that may have been available the whole time.
When you remove context and nuance to pursue an argument you are being disingenuous. You are lying through obfuscation.
If we're going to continue with our current form of representative government we are going to need people like Mack Miller, the Lt Governor candidate. We are going to need organizations like Project Veritas and the videos that they have that expose the warped biological mindset rampant in these institutions. If not, we will have to abolish those positions by no longer recognizing their authority. By cutting their funding, by protesting and boycotting the institutions that support them, and by maybe establishing alliances to ensure the people's collective will is observed. Having rights granted to us by a centralized authority consisting of governments and businesses is not freedom. Its fascism. Its tyranny.
Your right to object to your treatment by the state is being nullified. Eroded into non existence. And it doesn't matter if it's about the right actions according to ethics or science it's about the right things politically. And when the right thing to do politically is force you into experimentation how do you gather enough institutional power to refuse that? What if the information that they're banning is that we are being experimented on? What if I showed you that's its happening? Are you willing to resist it?
Mr. Miller is and so are the good people that were there supporting him and us. Godspeed to them and all of us in getting recognition of our rights back into our institutions. Or we have to stop recognizing them. Stop recognizing their authority. Build institutions of our own. And remove any power we give to tyrants. We must rid ourselves of false dichotomies that assert that the only way to find out if something works is to force everyone to do it. Imagine being in an experiment like that. Do I have to ask you to imagine anymore?
These institutions are watching and taking notes and adjusting according to what they are seeing in somewhat real time. They are slow on adjustments. Not very clear with their presentation of numbers. And they never verbally admit that the course they have taken was the wrong one. And no one holds them accountable. This is how tyrannical Centrally Planned governments operate.
We may have already reached the point where the people are so broken or ignorant that they would give themselves up for a financial or imaginary reward or worse, a penalty, in the form of death or disfigurement. Of inflamed hearts and clotted blood. And we're not done with the experiment until they can do this to all of our children. This has always been that fabled hill but we don't have to die. Demand Answers Not Orders.