EP10 THEY WERE LYING OUT OF THEIR ASSES: MONOLOGUE
We are increasingly losing touch with a common reality, where we can all look at something and define what it is. The objective world that we live in has become so subjective that anything can be up for interpretation. Self defense, justice, and even medicine have all been affected by this lately.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for the creative spirit that allows mankind to evolve and discover new ways of looking at things. From the enlightenment till now there has been plenty of progress in understanding the human condition, our behavior, and what we are ultimately meant to be. My vote is for freedom. The liberty to live the life you intend to lead, without the outside interference of any government or body and with the responsibility to not impose yourself unto others. But that interpretation of our rights and the philosophy behind it can be supported by facts, history, and analysis.
Our ability to reason as human beings is a tool that has to be sharpened and aimed at the right task to accomplish anything. If you spend all day staring at a banana peel asking yourself how to get the banana back in it and sealed up properly, you are probably wasting your time. You have every right to do so but if you're using my tax dollars to figure it out, if you're choosing to do that instead of stopping things like violent rioters if you happen to be a policeman, or if you want to force others to join in the efforts of putting the banana back in the peel, I have to object.
Our modern society is such a safe and warm place for many of its inhabitants, thanks to the sacrifices and discoveries made by previous generations. The necessity of the situations our ancestors found themselves in lead to many great inventions that we all enjoy and mostly take for granted now. Its hard for me to even imagine living a life without something as simple as shoes. Imagine having no transportation and no shoes. How much would that limit what you can do in your life?
But in order to produce shoes and market them to people you first have to have a basic understanding of what a shoe is. If you market a kitchen mixer as a shoe, you might get some complaints in your inbox. Shoes have evolved and have many uses but they are generally something you put on your feet. Without the public's basic understanding and definition of that and a need or purpose for it you are gonna have a hard time finding buyers.
Shoes can be many things, they can be collectible items, they can be art, and they can even be weapons, but if you can't decide what a shoe even is due to ignorance or confusion they cannot be any of those things. If you cannot agree with other humans what defines something as a shoe or that shoes even exist then there will be plenty of people walking around barefoot.
Our culture partly defines what things like shoes are. We categorize them in different sections of stores for a reason. Things are generally easier to interpret once they are defined and categorized. This need for order allows us all to agree on a general definition and the ability to assess our need for each item. But what if our culture forbid us to organize things in that way? What if it claimed that doing so is harmful to a specific part of the population if not us all?
This absurd comparison to being able to define and interpret what is a shoe is becoming less absurd by the day if you are seeing the reactions people are having to things like the verdict of the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. Certain people are so confused as to what defines things like self defense and what the laws on the books actually are, and even what actually occurred both in the incident and the trial that if the same thing applied to their understanding of shoes these people would be wearing them on their junk or trying to make spaghetti with them.
Our media is partly to blame for this of course because they failed to properly educate the public as to what actually occurred and define what laws if any were broken that night. They never course corrected, in fact many drove falsehoods like Kyle not being in legal possession of his firearm that evening. Others talked about the reason for the violent riot being about the police killing of a man who isn't dead. That man, Jacob Blake, was also in the act of stealing a car full of children from a woman whom he just digitally raped.
When the facts of the matter are discarded. When misinterpretations of things are propagated and then enforced as truth how can we ever expect to come to the rightful conclusion?
I fear more and more as I research situations like this that this is by design. I am starting to believe that our media is purposely lying to us. Manipulating us. To achieve what serves a greater connecting ideology with both the companies that own or influence media and the politicians who are owned or influenced by those same companies.
The corporate press is the last place to look for objective information anymore. They have gotten almost every politicized major story completely wrong if not upside down or backwards in the last few years. They are a funhouse mirror interpretation of the truth at best. Anyone relying on them to navigate today's cultural landscape shows a lack of critical thinking or ignorance that keeps their monopoly on stupid going. If they marketed shoes in the same way people would be complaining on Twitter that their shoes came with no soup inside of them as promised and some would be so convinced that not only did their shoes arrive with soup inside of them but they would brag about how delicious it was. The delusions that we are seeing reinforced by the influence of media and social media are driving people insane. Is this purposeful?
Yes I believe, because in Cultural Marxism the ability to define something belongs only to the state. Central planning needs to have arbitrary definitions for things because it needs to change definitions to win arguments and enforce new rules. We see it with the covid restrictions just as we've seen it in analysis of the Rittenhouse trial. Facts don't matter anymore. All that matters is power and the people who want it will use any psychological and emotionallly manipulative tactic to get it. That's why they use the construct of race while tearing down the construct of gender. That's why they claim that science is the way forward while silencing scientists or purposefully defining things like Ivermectin as horse paste.
Luckily there are enough of us who can still look at something like a shoe and know that its supposed to go on our feet. We can listen to a doctor describe how Ivermectin works and decide whether or not we should take it if we become ill with covid. The establishment in our country doesn't want us to be able to do that without their blessing. They feel that it is their right and duty to tell us what we can and cannot know or believe to know. That's why we need to defy them. Abolish them. Strip them of their power and throw them into the streets.
If we cannot live in a world where things have an objective definition and our interpretation is subject to the will of the state or a combination of the state and corporations then we will become completely helpless as a people. And that's exactly what these creeps want to happen. Because if you can make people helpless you can dictate their behavior. If you can make them dependent and malleable then you can predict the outcomes of what they engage in. Things like markets, resources, social movements, and government can all be controlled this way. It is the way of Stakeholder Capitalism, which is nothing more than re-branded Fascism.
To defeat these fascist monsters we need a common culture and understanding of human rights. We need to organize, agree on basic principles of liberty, codify those principles into law, and enforce them. Even with force if our rights are violated. That is the purpose of self defense. To preserve your life and liberty if it is threatened with aggressive actions. To lose that interpretation to mean anything else like achieving racial justice or to save the planet from global warming will lead us into the very acts of aggression that positive liberties demand vs negative liberties.
We know and have known for a long time what liberty means as Patriots. That each of us has the right to think and feel as we wish. That we all have a right to defend our bodies and other property that we own. If we allow the oligarchy that has taken over our media and government to define that then we forfeit our liberty. We can only expect absurdity or harm to come from that. After the legal victory for Kyle Rittenhouse this week, we need to move on to other victories in media, business, and government. If not, we stand to lose our connection to reality and our rights.